鐘翠頻 黃連英

Regardless of the changing top quality of ChatGPT’s health and fitness tips， some men and women have essentially been its followers in the gym.

John Yu， a TikTok content creator based mostly in the US， filmed himself sticking to a six-day fitness program of ChatGPT. He instructed it to give him a sample workout every day， tailored to which bit of his system he preferred to work （his arms， legs， and many others）， and then followed the workout plan. While the exercise routines it came up with were being properly good， Yu claimed， “Strictly pursuing what ChatGPT provides me is a thing I’m not definitely fascinated in.”

Lee Lem， a bodybuilding articles creator dependent in Australia， requested ChatGPT to develop a “first-rank leg day” plan. It recommended the appropriate kinds of exercises — squats（蹲姿）， lunges， deadlifts， and so on — but the rest periods between them were much as well short. “It’s tricky！” Lem states. “It’s quite unrealistic to only rest 30 seconds between squat sets.”

Lem hit on the core trouble with ChatGPT’s ideas： they fall short to consider human bodies. As Lem and Yu uncovered out， repetitive movements rapidly made people bored or weary. However， human coaches know how to blend their tips up. ChatGPT has to be specifically explained to.

What everyone has in common was their choice to address ChatGPT’s education tips as entertaining experiments rather than significant athletic guidance. They all experienced a good knowledge of physical fitness. They all knew it is essential to address its responses skeptically.

This doesn’t necessarily mean AI versions just cannot perform a position in acquiring fitness designs. But it does stress that they can’t be totally dependable. ChatGPT will improve and perfect its function of inquiring. For example， it may possibly ask users if there are any routines they dislike. But honestly， it cannot occur up with authentic ideas， and it has no basic knowing of the concepts it is repeating without understanding properly.

（材料來自MIT Technology Review網(wǎng)站，有刪改）

1. How does Lee Lem describe the fitness plan from ChatGPT？

A. Successful and promising.

B. Thoughtful and creative.

C. Reliable but boring.

D. All-sided but impractical.

2. What’s the disadvantage of ChatGPT according to the text？

A. Its high cost.

B. Machinery operation.

C. Lack of being humanized.

D. Limited choices of advice.

3. What is the author’s attitude to the potential of fitness program of ChatGPT？

A. Opposed. B. Doubtful.

C. Positive. ? D. Objective.

4. What’s the purpose of the text？

A. To promote a fitness program.

B. To introduce ChatGPT’s fitness plans.

C. To provide health and fitness tips.

D. To call on people to use ChatGPT.

1. D。解析：推理判斷題。材料第三段中提到“它推薦了適當(dāng)?shù)腻憻挿绞健疃住⒐?、硬舉等”和“每組深蹲之間只休息30秒是很不現(xiàn)實(shí)的”，由此可知，Lee Lem認(rèn)為ChatGPT所制訂的健身計(jì)劃是全面但不切實(shí)際的。故選D。

2. C。解析：推理判斷題。材料第四段直接指出了ChatGPT所制訂的健身計(jì)劃的不足之處，即“它們沒有考慮到人體情況”“重復(fù)的動(dòng)作很快就會(huì)讓人感到無聊或厭倦”“然而，人類教練知道如何融合他們的技巧”，由此可知，ChatGPT所制訂的健身計(jì)劃不夠人性化。故選C。

3. D。解析：細(xì)節(jié)理解題。材料最后一段的第一句和第二句提到“這并不一定意味著人工智能模型就不能在做出健身設(shè)計(jì)方面發(fā)揮作用，但這確實(shí)強(qiáng)調(diào)了它們不可能完全可靠”，由此可知，作者對(duì)ChatGPT所制訂的健身計(jì)劃的前景持客觀態(tài)度，故選D。

4. B。解析：寫作意圖題。材料第一段說到“不管ChatGPT的健康和健身建議的最高質(zhì)量如何變化，健身房里的一些男性和女性基本上都是它的追隨者”，材料最后一段中又提到“這并不一定意味著人工智能模型就不能在做出健身設(shè)計(jì)方面發(fā)揮作用”，由此可知，文章旨在介紹ChatGPT在健身方面的應(yīng)用。故選B。