陳志強(qiáng)

Step 1? ?感知·閱讀導(dǎo)航

隨著共享經(jīng)濟(jì)的蓬勃發(fā)展，“網(wǎng)約工”開(kāi)始涌入勞動(dòng)市場(chǎng)?！熬W(wǎng)約工”并不是一個(gè)專門的工種，而是指那些通過(guò)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)為消費(fèi)者提供服務(wù)的勞動(dòng)者群體的統(tǒng)稱，其中比較有代表性的就是我們熟知的快遞小哥、外賣騎手、代駕司機(jī)、上門廚師等。

隨著這一群體的規(guī)模越來(lái)越大，這一群體與互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)之間產(chǎn)生的勞動(dòng)糾紛也越來(lái)越多。多數(shù)“網(wǎng)約工”處于一種尷尬的境地：他們與互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)之間的法律關(guān)系過(guò)于模糊，很難維護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)利。這就導(dǎo)致“網(wǎng)約工”一旦出現(xiàn)意外工傷或勞動(dòng)損傷，他們的合法權(quán)益難以得到保障。

為保護(hù)“網(wǎng)約工”的權(quán)益，美國(guó)加州議會(huì)最近頒發(fā)了包括第5號(hào)議案在內(nèi)的一些法案。但這些法案卻由于自身的漏洞而飽受爭(zhēng)議。本文就此進(jìn)行了分析。

本文是一篇議論文。全文約446詞，建議用時(shí)8分鐘。

1. 理清文章的基本結(jié)構(gòu)，明確議論文的一般框架。

2. 區(qū)分文章的事實(shí)與觀點(diǎn)，掌握作者通過(guò)例證和引用闡明觀點(diǎn)的方法。

3. 能夠?qū)ξ恼碌闹饕畔⑦M(jìn)行提取、概括與整合，以讀促寫，讀寫結(jié)合。

4. 思考在共享經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下，“網(wǎng)約工”面臨的機(jī)遇、挑戰(zhàn)和困境，以及保護(hù)“網(wǎng)約工”合法權(quán)益的基本措施。

閱讀掃障

1. exploitation /？謣ekspl？蘅？奘？謖te？奘？蘩n/ n. 利用;剝削

2. freelance /？謖fri？蘼lɑ？蘼ns/ adj. 自由職業(yè)（者）的

3. contractor /k？藜n？謖tr？覸kt？藜（r）/ n. 承包人;承包商;承包公司

4. controversial /？謣k？鬑ntr？藜？謖v？誻？蘼？蘩l/ adj. 有爭(zhēng)議的;引起爭(zhēng)議的

5. compensation /？謣k？鬑mpen？謖se？奘？蘩n/ n. 賠償金;補(bǔ)償金

6. payroll tax 薪資稅;工資稅

7. subcontractor /？謣s？蘧bk？藜n？謖tr？覸kt？藜（r）/ n. 分包人;分包商

8. slot /sl？鬑t/ n. 位置;機(jī)會(huì)

In an unexpected twist， a series of new legislation that claims to stop the exploitation of freelance workers is causing a strong objection from some of the contractors who it？蒺s designed to protect.

California？蒺s AB 5 is among the most controversial. The law， which went into effect on Jan. 1， spells out detailed standards that must be met to determine whether workers are employees entitled to benefits and other protections， or contractors without those safety nets.

The law？蒺s arrival comes as the US increasingly relies on a freelance workforce， with businesses able to save up to 30% or more in costs using independent contractors rather than employees， according to the National Employment Law Project.

States have long had rules defining who is an employee versus a freelancer， particularly to sort out who qualifies for benefits like unemployment insurance and workers？蒺 compensation. Federal laws also contain definitions of who is， who isn？蒺t， and an employee or a contractor.

Last year， at least 15 states introduced bills related to worker classification， says Josh Cunningham， manager of the employment， labor， and retirement program for the National Conference of State Legislatures. Of those， bills in Delaware， Illinois and Nevada， as well as California， were signed into law.

“It is not new，” Rebecca Smith， director of work structures at the National Employment Law Project， said of such laws. “But what is new is the degree of organizing among workers， especially those in the gig economy. Workers across the country are joining together， standing up， and demanding that businesses stop gaming the system. And legislators are listening.”

Those who support the new laws say some are merely strengthening or spelling out rules previously established by labor officials or the courts. The goal is to prevent employers from misclassifying workers so they can avoid paying payroll taxes and guaranteeing them a minimum wage， workers？蒺 compensation and other protections.

Independent workers may be more vulnerable? than employees， not entitled to certain wages， insurance and other benefits. But many freelancers say they prefer the flexibility of not being tied to a single employer， while industries like trucking are built around a network of freestanding subcontractors.

In the wake of passage of AB 5， some freelance work is disappearing. Vox Media will create 20 new full？鄄time positions， while eliminating 200 freelance slots that covered California sports teams， saying that sticking to the law？蒺s limits on freelance content will be difficult.

“They？蒺re not going to force any news organization to hire more staff，” Mickey H. Osterreicher， General Counsel of the National Press Photographers Association， said of the legislation. “This will just ultimately have the effect of people who were earning an income having their income reduced or eliminated completely.”

—From USA Today

Step 2 理解·文本解讀

Ⅰ. Reading for the main idea

What does this passage mainly talk about？

A. Advantages of freelance workers are weakening.

B. Traditional law for labor market is taking a new turning.

C. Situations of freelance workers are growing worse and worse.

D. New legislation for freelance workers is causing a strong objection.

Ⅱ. Reading for the structure

Ⅲ. Reading for understanding

1. What is the purpose of enforcing the law？ And who has raised an objection against it？

_________________________________________________________________________________

2. What is the law mainly about？

_________________________________________________________________________________

3. Why could the law be enacted according to Para. 3～Para. 5？

_________________________________________________________________________________

4. How is the new law different from the past law in the field of the gig economy？

_________________________________________________________________________________

5. Why do some people support the new laws？

_________________________________________________________________________________

6. Why are some people against the new laws？

_________________________________________________________________________________

7. What might the new laws bring about？

_________________________________________________________________________________

【點(diǎn)石成金】任何體裁的文章都有其內(nèi)在的邏輯與層次關(guān)系，把握了這一關(guān)系，同學(xué)們就可以理清文本脈絡(luò)，準(zhǔn)確理解文本的深層含義。在閱讀不同體裁的文章時(shí)，同學(xué)們應(yīng)注意文章對(duì)中心話題的闡釋，形成有效的問(wèn)題鏈。本處設(shè)置的七個(gè)問(wèn)題，涉及法案的制定目的、內(nèi)容、背景、特點(diǎn)，人們對(duì)它的評(píng)價(jià)、態(tài)度，以及該法案的影響等，通過(guò)回答這些問(wèn)題，同學(xué)們就可以比較清晰地認(rèn)識(shí)這個(gè)新法案。明確信息提取與整合過(guò)程中的目標(biāo)也為后續(xù)的語(yǔ)言輸出做了較好的鋪墊。在回答問(wèn)題時(shí)，同學(xué)們應(yīng)注意適當(dāng)改變文中的原句，進(jìn)行必要的轉(zhuǎn)述。

Step 3 運(yùn)用·讀寫整合

Reading for writing

Supposing you are a freelancer， you are interviewed by a journalist about your attitude towards the new law. What would you say about it？

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

【點(diǎn)石成金】讀寫整合的重點(diǎn)就是以閱讀為語(yǔ)言輸入形式，在寫作過(guò)程中輸出語(yǔ)言，堅(jiān)持輸入和輸出的一致性。緊扣閱讀的話題，設(shè)計(jì)寫作任務(wù)，這能夠給學(xué)生足夠的支架或鋪墊，能夠保證閱讀文本中出現(xiàn)的重點(diǎn)詞匯的運(yùn)用。

情境是學(xué)生核心素養(yǎng)培育的途徑和方法，是實(shí)現(xiàn)核心素養(yǎng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。教師在教學(xué)過(guò)程中創(chuàng)設(shè)情境就是構(gòu)建課程知識(shí)內(nèi)容與學(xué)生的生活、經(jīng)驗(yàn)、情感和生命的連接紐帶。教學(xué)中所創(chuàng)設(shè)的情境要貼近學(xué)生的生活，并使得學(xué)生能夠在所創(chuàng)設(shè)的情境中運(yùn)用所學(xué)知識(shí)解決實(shí)際問(wèn)題。

Step 4 提升·素養(yǎng)建構(gòu)

一、閱讀微技能：Facts and opinions

在閱讀議論文時(shí)，我們需要區(qū)分文章的觀點(diǎn)和事實(shí)。觀點(diǎn)通常是作者的態(tài)度或看法，是文章的核心信息;而事實(shí)是用來(lái)佐證文章論點(diǎn)的論據(jù)，是支撐性信息或細(xì)節(jié)性信息。

A fact： A fact is a truth. A fact is a statement of truth that can be verified and is able to be proven as true. It is known to have happened or to exist， especially something for which proof exists， or about which there is information.

An opinion： An opinion is a statement that reflects an author？蒺s or the speaker？蒺s point of view， beliefs， perspectives， personal feelings， and values; opinions cannot be verified and proven to be true or false. However， a person？蒺s opinion can be supported or refuted（駁斥） when a critical thinker who is a critically thinking reader of a text scrutinizes（仔細(xì)審查） and critically evaluates the author？蒺s opinions， beliefs， perspectives， personal feelings and values， and these opinions are based on documented， valid and reliable facts.

Fill in the table below with an F if it is a fact or an O if it is an opinion.

二、中國(guó)外賣小哥因“非凡使命感”登上《時(shí)代周刊》封面

用一些“網(wǎng)約工”自己的說(shuō)法，“社保福利無(wú)人管，抽成罰款不手軟”是他們過(guò)去的生活寫照。然而，逆境之下，總有一些“網(wǎng)約工”成為最美的逆行者。3月19日，美國(guó)《時(shí)代周刊》發(fā)布抗疫群像，美團(tuán)外賣騎手高治曉作為唯一華人面孔登上封面。《時(shí)代周刊》在封面上對(duì)高治曉的介紹語(yǔ)為：

Beijing

Gao Zhixiao， 32，

a delivery driver who has continued working as the virus spreads across China.

《時(shí)代周刊》還引用了高治曉的話，以盛贊他的高度責(zé)任感。

“I felt a sense of responsibility because I manage a team of other riders， and some were still working in Wuhan， so I had to help them.”

3月17日，MSN官網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)此文，贊揚(yáng)高治曉。

拓展閱讀：P23? Delivery drivers during the coronavirus epidemic; P54 Time—a worldwide news magazine