国产日韩欧美一区二区三区三州_亚洲少妇熟女av_久久久久亚洲av国产精品_波多野结衣网站一区二区_亚洲欧美色片在线91_国产亚洲精品精品国产优播av_日本一区二区三区波多野结衣 _久久国产av不卡

?

sulinoma: Can we predict the long-term outcomes?

2022-06-28 04:14:38MajaCigrovskiBerkovicMonikaUlamecSonjaMarinovicIvanBalenAnnaMrzljak
World Journal of Clinical Cases 2022年16期

INTRODUCTION

Malignant insulinoma is a rare tumor entity, with an incidence of approximately 10% of all insulinoma cases. A sure sign of malignancy, differentiating benign from malignant insulinoma, is metastases (primarily in the liver) at diagnosis. Unfortunately, some benign insulinomas alter during the disease course, and according to more current analyses, malignant forms can also arise from non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), becoming clinically apparent when tumor burden and potential to secrete proinsulin increase. Although currently available therapeutic options offer symptom relief and tumor reduction even in the case of malignant insulinoma, better survival and quality of life are expected in the case of early detection of malignancy. This review summarizes the presenting characteristics that may help identify patients at risk of having malignant lesions and their therapeutic options.

FROM CLINICAL PRESENTATION TO DIAGNOSIS

The annual incidence of approximately 0.8/100000 persons makes PNETs a rare type of cancer. Functional PNETs, characterized by hypersecretion of a specific hormone, are even rarer. Of all functional PNETs, insulinomas are the most frequent, with an estimated incidence of 1-4 per million per year[1,2]. Four insulinoma characteristics are associated with the “90%” rate: 90% occur in the pancreas, 90% are benign, 90% are solitary, and 90% are less than 2 cm in diameter[3].

The clinical presentation of insulinoma includes different neuroglycopenic and autonomic symptoms through sympathetic nervous system activation due to hypoglycemia induced by periods of substrate deficiency. Insulinoma-related signs and symptoms are non-specific. On average, there is a 12-mo lag time before the insulinoma is suspected and diagnosed, giving them the fully deserved term neurological chameleon.

The gold standard for diagnosing insulinoma is hypoglycemia detected during a 72-h fasting test, accompanied by inappropriately elevated insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulin levels, with the latter being the best indicator of insulinoma. According to the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines, endogenous hyperinsulinism is diagnosed in the absence of oral hypoglycemic agent use when hypoglycemic signs and/or symptoms are present in association with plasma glucose level < 3 mmol/L, insulin level > 18 pmol/L, C-peptide > 0.2 nmol/L, and proinsulin > 5 pmol/L[4].

While the biochemical diagnostic criteria for insulinoma, in general, are well established and prove sensitive and specific, the differences between benign and malignant insulinoma are not always clear[4].

Critic Steven Jones considers the daughter to be a typical persecuted heroine in fairy tale style. First she finds herself in danger thanks to her father s boasting. Then she marries the king after trial and tribulation along with the promise to give up her firstborn. Finally she fights to save her child by accomplishing the seemingly impossible task of naming her former helper (Jones 1993, 18).Return to place in story.

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF INSULINOMAS - DO WE KNOW ENOUGH TO PREDICT MALIGNANT BEHAVIOR OF INSULINOMA?

During insulinoma tumorigenesis, the cell physiology is altered through the changes in several pathways, resulting in an increased replicative potential, self-sufficiency in growth signals, evasion of apoptosis, and potential to invade other tissues[5] (Figure 1). Research on genomics and transcriptomics of human insulinomas was mainly done on hereditary forms and the MEN1 syndrome is the most common hereditary type of PNET caused by autosomal dominant germline alteration in the

(11q13) gene encoding the menin protein[6]. Because 10%-30% of individuals with MEN1 mutation develop insulinoma[7], menin was proposed as a candidate marker in the tumorigenesis of insulinoma. In pancreatic β-cells, menin has a role in maintaining the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors p27 and p18 to prevent enhanced pancreatic islet proliferation and subsequent tumorigenesis[8]. Moreover, menin prevents tumorigenesis by several additional mechanisms, such as the induction of transcription factor JunD to maintain normal growth regulation[9] and the induction of FANCD2 to induce the DNA repair[10]. Tumors of MEN1 syndrome patients often show an increase in the frequency of spontaneous chromosomal alterations and multiple allelic deletions[11], including the presence of mismatch-repair deficiency and a high rate of microsatellite instability in patients with malignant insulinoma[12]. Diversely, menin also acts as a repressor of SMAD3, p65-mediated transcriptional activation of NF-κB, as well as dlk1/Pref-1, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and QM/Jif-1, which leads to inhibition of cell growth and stimulation of apoptosis[13-14]. Apart from menin, mutations in Yin Yang1 (

) gene, which increases insulin secretion by β-cells, were found in approximately 20% of insulinoma patients. YY1 is a transcription factor that regulates insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling and its mutations are only found in insulinomas, but not other malignant PNETs, suggesting that this mutation could serve for specific diagnosis of insulinoma[15].

Jeffrey Karp, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and co-director of the Center for Regenerative Therapeutics at Brigham and Women s Hospital, is also a senior author of the paper. Lead author is Woo Kyung Cho, a postdoc in the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST).

CDK4 and its regulatory subunit cyclin D are the main regulators of cell cycle progression of Langerhans islet β-cells. Albeit there are no differences in expression of CDK4 protein[16], overexpression of cyclin D and downregulation of cyclin D inhibitors p15 and p16 have been observed in both benign and advanced lesions, suggesting their role in the tumorigenesis of insulinomas[17-18]. Apart from CDKs, that are other key regulators of cell cycle progression, and

-

and

are two key oncogenes whose somatic mutations lead to loss of cell cycle regulation.

However, he had to follow his guides in silence, and they led him into a magnificent hall; the floor was of ebony, the walls of jet, and all the hangings were of black velvet54, but the Prince looked round it in vain for something to eat, and then made signs that he was hungry

Even though

and K-ras gene mutations are rare events that are not involved in the tumorigenesis of neuroendocrine tumors[19], activation of the Ras/RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and its inhibitor Raf-1 kinase inhibitory protein has been shown to play a role in the progression of insulinomas[20,21].

Furthermore, transforming growth factor α and its receptor epidermal growth factor receptor have been associated with the activation of the Ras signaling pathway and its oncogenic activity in malignant insulinoma[22].

mTOR is the other ubiquitous and highly conserved serine/threonine kinase that regulates several cellular functions, including cell proliferation. The expression of mTOR and P70S6K is high in insulinoma specimens, and

mTOR inhibitors can prevent the proliferation of insulinoma cells[23].

The morbidity of insulinoma is primarily due to hypoglycemia-related symptoms, while malignant insulinomas add morbidity and mortality due to their aggressiveness and invasion of adjacent tissues and metastasis[30]. In patients who do not have an extra-pancreatic disease at the initial presentation, the prediction of clinical behaviour is difficult as comparative studies between benign and malignant cases are limited[31,32].

Apart from cell proliferation, evasion of apoptosis is the other hallmark of most types of cancer. Even though p53 mutations in insulinoma are rarely found[24], high expression of wild-type p53 is found in almost all malignant insulinomas where it can further activate the cell death promoting factor Bax[25,26]. Furthermore, increased expression of the apoptosis inhibitor Bcl-2, found in one-third of insulinomas, suggests that it might be involved in insulinoma tumorigenesis[27].

Survivin is another apoptosis inhibitor whose gene is located in the chromosome region changed in one-third of malignant insulinomas[28]. In addition, several candidate proteins, such as P73, NOTCH1, and BRCC2, play a role in the evasion of apoptosis and insulinoma progression; however, their exact roles in insulinoma tumorigenesis remain elusive[29].

A retrospective series of 311 patients treated for insulinoma in Mayo Clinic showed biochemical and pathological differences between benign and malignant insulinoma[35]. Malignant cases had higher than expected insulin and proinsulin levels and tumors of a larger size (4.2 cm compared to 1.8 cm seen in patients with benign insulinoma). Both malignant and benign insulinoma occurred sporadically and in patients with MEN1 syndrome[35].

HOW TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT INSULINOMA?

I began to dread2 going to math. I was tired of their swear words, their stories of drugs and violence, and their negative attitudes. Some days they would come into the room in such a bad mood that everyone could feel it. I began to resent the fact that I had to be there. One girl in particular began to eat away at my nerves. Some days I wanted to hide under my desk.

And then her dreams changed, but the charming Prince figured in them all; and when morning came her first thought was to look at the portrait, and see if it was really like him, and she found that it certainly was

Although there is a new 2019 NETs classification[33,34], in most insulinoma studies the tumor classification is based on the macroscopic (tumor size and invasion of surrounding tissue/vascular invasion), microscopic (mitotic count per 10 high power fields), and immunohistochemical features (Ki-67 proliferation index and neuroendocrine markers).

He did not hesitate. He squared his shoulders and said, I m John, and you must be Miss Maynell. I am so glad you could meet me; may I take you to dinner?

Histologically, there are no accurate criteria to distinguish benign from malignant insulinomas. Malignant tumors are usually larger than 2, even 3 cm, showing higher Ki-67 proliferative activity, mostly G2 or even G3 NETs[35,36].

14. What will you give me if I spin it for you?: Magical helpers rarely help the protagonists in fairy tales without a good reason or bargain. In fairy tales, either the main character is virtuous and thus earns help or she must make a bargain, usually one she would not make except in desperate circumstances. In some earlier versions of the tale, the little man freely helps the maid with no bargain required. Return to place in story.

Microscopically, tumors show a trabecular, nested, and solid growth pattern with uniform cells and small round nuclei showing pepper-like chromatin. Their cytoplasm is eosinophilic and abundant. Immunohistochemically, cells are positive for neuroendocrine markers like synaptophysin and chromogranin; insulin staining is not mandatory for the diagnosis (Figure 2). Insulinoma tumor cells contain less insulin and secretory granules than normal β-cells but higher levels of proinsulin.

From one Shrove Tuesday to another, much may occur to weigh down the heart; it is the reckoning of a whole year; much may be forgotten, sins against heaven in word and thought, sins against our neighbor, and against our own conscience

Malignant forms can be expected in 4-14% of cases and occur more often in younger age (< 50 years) and in males (77%)[37]. Insulinemia and 2 to 3-fold higher C-peptide levels with hypoglycemia occurring within the first 8 h of the 72-h fast might suggest malignancy[38,39]. However, metastases are a sure sign of malignancy.

Even though several signaling pathways have been suggested to affect the etiology and behavior of insulinomas, our knowledge is still limited. Detailed pathway-specific expression profiling and better model systems are required to resolve the conflicting results and further improve the understanding of pathway-specific genes involved in malignant insulinoma pathogenesis and improve the individualization of treatment.

In the past decades, much effort has been made to form the risk stratification of pNETs, and staging and grading according to the Ki67 index have been proposed as a tool to differentiate between benign and malignant tumor forms.

In addition, chromosomal instability (6q loss, and gains in 12q, 14q, and 17q) was found to be a strong predictor of the metastatic potential of insulinoma, and when used combined with histopathologic parameters, tumor size, and Ki67 index, it might improve the early diagnosis of malignant insulinoma[40].

Patients presenting earlier with clinical symptoms of neuroglycopenia during the fast have distinctly worse histopathological tumor characteristics. Insulin concentrations at the beginning and at the end of the fast correlate with the Ki-67 index and tumor size, linking grading and size with hormonal activity in insulinoma. When applying the Ki675% cut-off between the patients in the GI and GII/III group, higher staged patients suffer from significantly lower glucose concentrations, and have increased insulin and C-peptide levels, and a higher insulin secretion index compared to the GI group. Additionally, the tumor recurrence rate is about threefold higher in GII/GIII stage when the same Ki67 cut-off is applied compared to GI stage tumors[41].

A series of 103 insulinoma patients from Brazil showed a greater preponderance of malignant forms in males, with higher chromogranin A levels, shorter duration of symptoms, lower blood glucose (BG) levels, higher insulin and C-peptide levels, larger tumor size, and a tumor primarily located in the pancreatic head. Malignant tumors were quite aggressive, with a mortality rate nearing 85% and fiveyear average survival of 24%. Interestingly, among the malignant insulinomas, time to death varied from few months to up to 25 years after the diagnosis. Thus, some malignant insulinomas seemed to have more aggressive and others more indolent behavior. In this case series, most patients (77%) had malignant insulinoma at the time of diagnosis, and 23% had this diagnosis during follow-up[36].

Similar survival rates were recorded in a widely cited 50-year-long follow-up of 237 insulinoma patients (among whom 13 with metastatic forms) at Mayo Clinic where the 10-year postoperative survival was 88% of patients with benign compared to 29% of patients with metastatic disease[42]. In a more recent study, based on the data of 81 patients with metastatic insulinoma from 30 European NET registries, a 5-year survival improved to 55.6%[43].

More contemporary analysis of malignant insulinoma cases suggests their origin from nonfunctioning PNETs, developing phenotypic shift characterized by metachronous insulin hypersecretion after several years. Non-functioning PNET cells originally probably harbor rare cells expressing insulin and/or proinsulin, but the quantity of their concentration in circulation is initially too small to cause clinically recognizable symptoms. Only after the tumor burden grows large enough, usually with liver metastasis, the tumor cells can produce the amounts of insulin and proinsulin large enough to cause hypoglycemia[44]. Therefore, nonfunctioning PNETs, especially when accompanied by elevated chromogranin A levels (an ubiquitous NET marker which is usually low in case of benign tumors) as well as pancreastatin, need to be surveilled more closely, while they potentially give rise to malignant tumors. Moreover, at the time of diagnosis, in case benign insulinoma is initially suspected, additional molecular and genetic markers, such as α-internexin, might add awareness of malignant potential[45].

Recurrence of the tumor after initial surgery has always been accompanied by hypoglycemia, therefore continuing regular monitoring of BG levels is needed during patients visits[36].

When she came in she smelled around her and went all about the hut, tapping with the pestle; but pry37 and examine as she might, again she could see no reason to find fault and was angrier than ever. She clapped her hands and shouted:

Additionally, there was an attempt to analyze postoperative hyperglycemia as a prognostic sign after resection. The data coming from a small patient series could not differentiate immediate or perioperative glucose levels (as a threshold BG > 10 mmol/L) by tumor size, insulin production, and/or malignancy, making it an unreliable marker for surgical cure/residual tumor[46]. On the other hand, high proinsulin levels and large proinsulin/insulin molar ratio (although at present there is no unique cut-off value) are indicative of malignant insulinoma, therefore a new term “proinsulinoma” might be more appropriate for malignant tumor forms[45].

TREATMENT OF INSULINOMA - ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN APPROACH AND FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT INSULINOMA

A comprehensive approach is required to treat malignant insulinoma, and includes medication, surgery, and interventional therapy.

A year passed. I earned my master of arts degree in special education and accepted a position as a special education teacher for the state of Connecticut. I had learned my lessons well. However, I was about to learn an even greater lesson, and Annie Mae would be the teacher.

Regardless of benign or malignant insulinoma, behavior dietary modifications, treatment with diazoxide, and octreotide or pasireotide represent plausible options for hypoglycemia avoidance[37,47-49] and patients with the malignant type more often demonstrate pronounced neuroglycopenic symptoms[50].

Biochemical and imaging follow-up in patients with insulinoma should be done frequently: Every 3 to 6 mo for G1 and G2, and every 2 to 3 mo for G3, along with yearly somatostatin receptor imaging or FDG PET (if positive at diagnosis)[61].

Antiproliferative effect of everolimus and sunitinib prolongs progression-free survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic insulinoma[55,56]. In case of failure, chemotherapy protocol with streptozotocin, doxorubicin, and/or 5-fluorouracil for G1 and G2, or cisplatin with etoposide for G3 malignant insulinoma should be considered[57].

In patients with somatostatin receptor positive tumors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with radiolabelled peptides yttrium (

Y) or lutetium (

Lu) linked to a somatostatin analogue significantly extends progression-free survival[58,59].

Tumors are graded as: G1 or well-differentiated (low grade) tumors: Size up to 2 cm, mitotic count < 2 mitoses/10 HPFs, Ki-67 index < 2%, and no local invasion or regional or distant metastases; G2 (intermediate grade): Tumor size > 2 cm, limited to the pancreas or with minimal local extension, mitotic count of 2-20 mitoses/10 HPFs, and Ki-67 index of 3-20%, with or without metastases; G3 (high grade): Local invasion, mitotic count > 20/10 HPFs, and/or Ki-67 index > 20%, with or without metastases[34,35].

In context of insulinoma management, surgical procedures can be potentially curable, in addition treatments with newer agents prolong progression-free survival of patients with malignant insulinoma. Cytoreductive surgery is favorable to control hormone secretion. Moreover, patients’ quality of life is improved by new hypoglycemia detection technological tools (continuous glucose monitoring systems-CGM) that help patients in real time glucose monitoring and through audio and vibration-based alerts prevent severe hypoglycemic episodes[60].

In case of malignant insulinoma, extensive surgical procedures, including complete oncological resection along with regional lymph nodes dissections, are warranted[35]. Since more than 80% of the patients have liver metastasis[50], hepatic burden can be treated by hepatic resection or hepatic artery embolization combined with doxorubicin or streptozotocin[51,52]. Liver transplantation represents a treatment option for macroscopic and concealed micrometastases in the liver[53] after curative resection of primary insulinoma, for selected patients with less than 50% of liver involvement and Ki-67 index of less than 5 to 10%[54].

The diagnostic and therapeutic pathway of an insulinoma patient mostly relies on the awareness of clinical symptoms prerogative to a single specialist such as gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, or oncologists. However, an integrated approach in a form of a multidisciplinary team combined with current NET related guidelines should aspire to improve clinical management and outcomes[62].

CONCLUSION

Malignant insulinomas, besides hypoglycemia-related symptoms, cause morbidity and mortality due to their local aggressiveness. To our current knowledge, the presence of metastasis differentiates benign from malignant insulinoma since histological criteria are insufficient. Detailed pathway-specific expression profiling would improve the understanding of malignant insulinoma pathogenesis, and identification of specific genes could predict the long-term outcomes of insulinoma management. The small number of affected patients precludes quality research of therapeutic options. Further research is mandatory to improve the individualization of treatment for patients with insulinoma, particularly malignant variants.

Messengers were forthwith despatched to the garden house, and after awhile they returned bringing a negro whom they had discovered in a secret chamber181 underneath the throne of Mihr-afruz, dressed in a dress of honour, and surrounded with luxury

FOOTNOTES

Cigrovski Berkovic M made contribution to the conception and design of the study, and drafted and revised the manuscript critically; Marinovic S, Ulamec M, Balen I, and Mrzljak A collected the data, and drafted and wrote the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.

This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Croatia

Maja Cigrovski Berkovic 0000-0003-0750-9785; Monika Ulamec 0000-0002-4843-8154; Sonja Marinovic 0000-0002-4054-338X; Ivan Balen 0000-0002-7071-539X; Anna Mrzljak 0000-0001-6270-2305.

“You poor child,” said the prince and princess; then they praised the crows, and said they were not angry for what they had done, but that it must not happen again, and this time they should be rewarded.

Ma YJ

Wang TQ

Ma YJ

1 Vaidakis D, Karoubalis J, Pappa T, Piaditis G, Zografos GN. Pancreatic insulinoma: current issues and trends.

2010 ; 9 : 234 -241 [PMID: 20525548 ]

2 Mehrabi A, Fischer L, Hafezi M, Dirlewanger A, Grenacher L, Diener MK, Fonouni H, Golriz M, Garoussi C, Fard N,Rahbari NN, Werner J, Büchler MW. A systematic review of localization, surgical treatment options, and outcome of insulinoma.

2014 ; 43 : 675 -686 [PMID: 24921202 DOI: 10 .1097 /MPA.0000000000000110 ]

3 Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Sumiyoshi T, Kozuki A, Ito S, Ogawa Y, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Diagnosis and management of insulinoma.

2013 ; 19 : 829 -837 [PMID: 23430217 DOI: 10 .3748 /wjg.v19 .i6 .829 ]

4 Cryer PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, Heller SR, Montori VM, Seaquist ER, Service FJ; Endocrine Society. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

2009 ; 94 : 709 -728 [PMID: 19088155 DOI: 10 .1210 /jc.2008 -1410 ]

5 Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000 ; 100 : 57 -70 [PMID: 10647931 DOI:10 .1016 /s0092 -8674 (00 )81683 -9 ]

6 Ma ZY, Gong YF, Zhuang HK, Zhou ZX, Huang SZ, Zou YP, Huang BW, Sun ZH, Zhang CZ, Tang YQ, Hou BH.Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management.

2020 ;26 : 2305 -2322 [PMID: 32476795 DOI: 10 .3748 /wjg.v26 .i19 .2305 ]

7 Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A, Bilezikian JP, Beck-Peccoz P, Bordi C, Conte-Devolx B, Falchetti A, Gheri RG, Libroia A, Lips CJ, Lombardi G, Mannelli M, Pacini F, Ponder BA, Raue F, Skogseid B, Tamburrano G, Thakker RV, Thompson NW, Tomassetti P, Tonelli F, Wells SA Jr, Marx SJ. Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2 .

2001 ; 86 : 5658 -5671 [PMID: 11739416 DOI: 10 .1210 /jcem.86 .12 .8070 ]

8 Karnik SK, Hughes CM, Gu X, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, McLean GW, Xiong Y, Meyerson M, Kim SK. Menin regulates pancreatic islet growth by promoting histone methylation and expression of genes encoding p27 Kip1 and p18 INK4 c.

2005 ; 102 : 14659 -14664 [PMID: 16195383 DOI: 10 .1073 /pnas.0503484102 ]

9 Agarwal SK, Novotny EA, Crabtree JS, Weitzman JB, Yaniv M, Burns AL, Chandrasekharappa SC, Collins FS, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ. Transcription factor JunD, deprived of menin, switches from growth suppressor to growth promoter.

2003 ; 100 : 10770 -10775 [PMID: 12960363 DOI: 10 .1073 /pnas.1834524100 ]

10 Jin S, Mao H, Schnepp RW, Sykes SM, Silva AC, D'Andrea AD, Hua X. Menin associates with FANCD2 , a protein involved in repair of DNA damage.

2003 ; 63 : 4204 -4210 [PMID: 12874027 ]

11 Hessman O, Skogseid B, Westin G, Akerstr?m G. Multiple allelic deletions and intratumoral genetic heterogeneity in men1 pancreatic tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001 ; 86 : 1355 -1361 [PMID: 11238532 DOI: 10 .1210 /jcem.86 .3 .7332 ]

12 Starr J, Puebla G, McMillan J, Lewis JT, Kasi PM. Microsatellite Instability-High, Malignant Insulinoma With Brain Metastasis.

2021 ; 13 : e16969 [PMID: 34527457 DOI: 10 .7759 /cureus.16969 ]

13 La P, Schnepp RW, D Petersen C, C Silva A, Hua X. Tumor suppressor menin regulates expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 . Endocrinology 2004 ; 145 : 3443 -3450 [PMID: 15044367 DOI: 10 .1210 /en.2004 -0124 ]

14 Liu L, Broaddus RR, Yao JC, Xie S, White JA, Wu TT, Hamilton SR, Rashid A. Epigenetic alterations in neuroendocrine tumors: methylation of RAS-association domain family 1 , isoform A and p16 genes are associated with metastasis.

2005 ; 18 : 1632 -1640 [PMID: 16258509 DOI: 10 .1038 /modpathol.3800490 ]

15 Cao Y, Gao Z, Li L, Jiang X, Shan A, Cai J, Peng Y, Li Y, Huang X, Wang J, Wei Q, Qin G, Zhao J, Jin X, Liu L, Wang W, Ning G. Whole exome sequencing of insulinoma reveals recurrent T372 R mutations in YY1 . Nat Commun 2013 ; 4 :2810 [PMID: 24326773 DOI: 10 .1038 /ncomms3810 ]

16 Vax VV, Bibi R, Diaz-Cano S, Gueorguiev M, Kola B, Borboli N, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Walker GJ, Dedov II, Grossman AB, Korbonits M. Activating point mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase 4 are not seen in sporadic pituitary adenomas,insulinomas or Leydig cell tumours.

2003 ; 178 : 301 -310 [PMID: 12904177 DOI: 10 .1677 /joe.0 .1780301 ]

17 Tomita T. Cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk6 ) and p16 in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Pathology 2004 ; 36 : 566 -570[PMID: 15841692 DOI: 10 .1080 /00313020400011342 ]

18 Lubomierski N, Kersting M, Bert T, Muench K, Wulbrand U, Schuermann M, Bartsch D, Simon B. Tumor suppressor genes in the 9 p21 gene cluster are selective targets of inactivation in neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors.

2001 ; 61 : 5905 -5910 [PMID: 11479232 ]

19 Allen A, Qin ACR, Raj N, Wang J, Uddin S, Yao Z, Tang L, Meyers PA, Taylor BS, Berger MF, Yaeger R, Reidy-Lagunes D, Pratilas CA. Rare BRAF mutations in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may predict response to RAF and MEK inhibition.

2019 ; 14 : e0217399 [PMID: 31158244 DOI: 10 .1371 /journal.pone.0217399 ]

20 Tannapfel A, Vomschloss S, Karhoff D, Markwarth A, Hengge UR, Wittekind C, Arnold R, H?rsch D. BRAF gene mutations are rare events in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

2005 ; 123 : 256 -260 [PMID:15842051 ]

21 Lai TH, Ahmed M, Hwang JS, Zada S, Pham TM, Elashkar O, Kim DR. Transcriptional Repression of Raf Kinase Inhibitory Protein Gene by Metadherin during Cancer Progression.

2021 ; 22 [PMID: 33802672 DOI:10 .3390 /ijms22063052 ]

22 Hsieh ET, Shepherd FA, Tsao MS. Co-expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factoralpha is independent of ras mutations in lung adenocarcinoma.

2000 ; 29 : 151 -157 [PMID: 10963846 DOI:10 .1016 /s0169 -5002 (00 )00116 -1 ]

23 Zhan HX, Cong L, Zhao YP, Zhang TP, Chen G, Zhou L, Guo JC. Activated mTOR/P70 S6 K signaling pathway is involved in insulinoma tumorigenesis.

2012 ; 106 : 972 -980 [PMID: 22711648 DOI: 10 .1002 /jso.23176 ]

24 Jonkers YM, Claessen SM, Veltman JA, Geurts van Kessel A, Dinjens WN, Skogseid B, Ramaekers FC, Speel EJ.Molecular parameters associated with insulinoma progression: chromosomal instability

p53 and CK19 status.

2006 ; 115 : 289 -297 [PMID: 17124412 DOI: 10 .1159 /000095926 ]

25 Pavelic K, Hrascan R, Kapitanovic S, Vranes Z, Cabrijan T, Spaventi S, Korsic M, Krizanac S, Li YQ, Stambrook P,Gluckman JL, Pavelic ZP. Molecular genetics of malignant insulinoma.

1996 ; 16 : 1707 -1717 [PMID:8712689 ]

26 Batta K, Kundu TK. Activation of p53 function by human transcriptional coactivator PC4 : role of protein-protein interaction, DNA bending, and posttranslational modifications.

2007 ; 27 : 7603 -7614 [PMID: 17785449 DOI:10 .1128 /MCB.01064 -07 ]

27 Wang DG, Johnston CF, Buchanan KD. Oncogene expression in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors:implications for pathogenesis.

1997 ; 80 : 668 -675 [PMID: 9264349 DOI:10 .1002 /(SICI)1097 -0142 (19970815 )80 :4 <668 ::AID-CNCR4 >3 .0 .CO;2 -J]

28 Ekeblad S, Lejonklou MH, St?lberg P, Skogseid B. Prognostic relevance of survivin in pancreatic endocrine tumors.

2012 ; 36 : 1411 -1418 [PMID: 22089920 DOI: 10 .1007 /s00268 -011 -1345 -7 ]

29 Jonkers YM, Claessen SM, Feuth T, van Kessel AG, Ramaekers FC, Veltman JA, Speel EJ. Novel candidate tumour suppressor gene loci on chromosomes 11 q23 -24 and 22 q13 involved in human insulinoma tumourigenesis. J Pathol 2006 ;210 : 450 -458 [PMID: 17068744 DOI: 10 .1002 /path.2072 ]

30 Queiroz Almeida M, Machado MC, Correa-Giannella ML, Giannella-Neto D, Albergaria Pereira MA. Endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia: diagnostic strategies, predictive features of malignancy and long-term survival.

2006 ; 29 : 679 -687 [PMID: 17033255 DOI: 10 .1007 /BF03344176 ]

31 Bégu-Le Corroller A, Valéro R, Moutardier V, Henry JF, Le Treut YP, Gueydan M, De Micco C, Sierra M, Conte-Devolx B, Oliver C, Raccah D, Favre R, Digue L, Heim M, Seitz JF, Delpero JR, Vialettes B. Aggressive multimodal therapy of sporadic malignant insulinoma can improve survival: a retrospective 35 -year study of 12 patients. Diabetes Metab 2008 ;34 : 343 -348 [PMID: 18556231 DOI: 10 .1016 /j.diabet.2008 .01 .013 ]

32 Baudin E, Caron P, Lombard-Bohas C, Tabarin A, Mitry E, Reznick Y, Taieb D, Pattou F, Goudet P, Vezzosi D, Scoazec JY, Cadiot G, Borson-Chazot F, Do Cao C; Société fran?aise d’endocrinologie; Groupe d’étude des tumeurs endocrines.Malignant insulinoma: recommendations for characterisation and treatment.

2013 ; 74 : 523 -533[PMID: 23993836 DOI: 10 .1016 /j.ando.2013 .07 .001 ]

33 Kloeppel G. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias. In: The WHO Classification of Endocrine Tumors. Lyon, France:IARC Press; 2017 : 209 -240

34 Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, Paradis V, Rugge M, Schirmacher P, Washington KM, Carneiro F, Cree IA; WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system.

2020 ; 76 : 182 -188 [PMID: 31433515 DOI: 10 .1111 /his.13975 ]

35 Sada A, Yamashita TS, Glasgow AE, Habermann EB, Thompson GB, Lyden ML, Dy BM, Halfdanarson TR, Vella A,McKenzie TJ. Comparison of benign and malignant insulinoma.

2021 ; 221 : 437 -447 [PMID: 32873371 DOI:10 .1016 /j.amjsurg.2020 .08 .003 ]

36 Camara-de-Souza AB, Toyoshima MTK, Giannella ML, Freire DS, Camacho CP, Louren?o DM Jr, Rocha MS, Bacchella T, Jureidini R, Machado MCC, Almeida MQ, Pereira MAA. Insulinoma: A retrospective study analyzing the differences between benign and malignant tumors.

2018 ; 18 : 298 -303 [PMID: 29452754 DOI:10 .1016 /j.pan.2018 .01 .009 ]

37 Brown E, Watkin D, Evans J, Yip V, Cuthbertson DJ. Multidisciplinary management of refractory insulinomas.

2018 ; 88 : 615 -624 [PMID: 29205458 DOI: 10 .1111 /cen.13528 ]

38 Ekeblad S, Skogseid B, Dunder K, Oberg K, Eriksson B. Prognostic factors and survival in 324 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumor treated at a single institution.

2008 ; 14 : 7798 -7803 [PMID: 19047107 DOI:10 .1158 /1078 -0432 .CCR-08 -0734 ]

39 Panzuto F, Boninsegna L, Fazio N, Campana D, Pia Brizzi M, Capurso G, Scarpa A, De Braud F, Dogliotti L, Tomassetti P, Delle Fave G, Falconi M. Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression.

2011 ; 29 : 2372 -2377 [PMID: 21555696 DOI:10 .1200 /JCO.2010 .33 .0688 ]

40 Jonkers YM, Claessen SM, Perren A, Schmid S, Komminoth P, Verhofstad AA, Hofland LJ, de Krijger RR, Slootweg PJ,Ramaekers FC, Speel EJ. Chromosomal instability predicts metastatic disease in patients with insulinomas.

2005 ; 12 : 435 -447 [PMID: 15947114 DOI: 10 .1677 /erc.1 .00960 ]

41 Wolf P, Winhofer Y, Smajis S, Anderwald CH, Scheuba C, Niederle B, Gessl A, Luger A, Krebs M, Koperek O. Clinical presentation in insulinoma predicts histopathological tumour characteristics.

2015 ; 83 : 67 -71 [PMID:25817061 DOI: 10 .1111 /cen.12777 ]

42 Service FJ, McMahon MM, O'Brien PC, Ballard DJ. Functioning insulinoma--incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival of patients: a 60 -year study. Mayo Clin Proc 1991 ; 66 : 711 -719 [PMID: 1677058 DOI:10 .1016 /s0025 -6196 (12 )62083 -7 ]

43 Lepage C, Ciccolallo L, De Angelis R, Bouvier AM, Faivre J, Gatta G; EUROCARE working group. European disparities in malignant digestive endocrine tumours survival.

2010 ; 126 : 2928 -2934 [PMID: 19569047 DOI:10 .1002 /ijc.24698 ]

44 de Mestier L, Hentic O, Cros J, Walter T, Roquin G, Brixi H, Lombard-Bohas C, Hammel P, Diebold MD, Couvelard A,Ruszniewski P, Cadiot G. Metachronous hormonal syndromes in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a caseseries study.

2015 ; 162 : 682 -689 [PMID: 25984844 DOI: 10 .7326 /M14 -2132 ]

45 Yu R, Nissen NN, Hendifar A, Tang L, Song YL, Chen YJ, Fan X. A Clinicopathological Study of Malignant Insulinoma in a Contemporary Series.

2017 ; 46 : 48 -56 [PMID: 27984486 DOI: 10 .1097 /MPA.0000000000000718 ]

46 Nockel P, Tirosh A, El Lakis M, Gaitanidis A, Merkel R, Patel D, Nilubol N, Sadowski SM, Cochran C, Gorden P,Kebebew E. Incidence and management of postoperative hyperglycemia in patients undergoing insulinoma resection.

2018 ; 61 : 422 -427 [PMID: 29923016 DOI: 10 .1007 /s12020 -018 -1633 -1 ]

47 Gill GV, Rauf O, MacFarlane IA. Diazoxide treatment for insulinoma: a national UK survey. Postgrad Med J 1997 ; 73 :640 -641 [PMID: 9497974 DOI: 10 .1136 /pgmj.73 .864 .640 ]

48 Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, Bertino EM, Brendtro K, Chan JA, Chen H, Jensen RT, Kim MK, Klimstra DS,Kulke MH, Liu EH, Metz DC, Phan AT, Sippel RS, Strosberg JR, Yao JC; North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

2013 ; 42 : 557 -577[PMID: 23591432 DOI: 10 .1097 /MPA.0 b013 e31828 e34 a4 ]

49 Hendren NS, Panach K, Brown TJ, Peng L, Beg MS, Weissler J, Mirfakhraee S. Pasireotide for the treatment of refractory hypoglycaemia from malignant insulinoma.

2018 ; 88 : 341 -343 [PMID: 29055143 DOI:10 .1111 /cen.13503 ]

50 Yu J, Ping F, Zhang H, Li W, Yuan T, Fu Y, Feng K, Xia W, Xu L, Li Y. Clinical Management of Malignant Insulinoma: a single Institution's experience over three decades.

2018 ; 18 : 92 [PMID: 30522468 DOI:10 .1186 /s12902 -018 -0321 -8 ]

51 Steinmüller T, Kianmanesh R, Falconi M, Scarpa A, Taal B, Kwekkeboom DJ, Lopes JM, Perren A, Nikou G, Yao J,Delle Fave GF, O'Toole D; Frascati Consensus Conference participants. Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with liver metastases from digestive (neuro)endocrine tumors: foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary.

2008 ; 87 : 47 -62 [PMID: 18097131 DOI: 10 .1159 /000111037 ]

52 Kress O, Wagner HJ, Wied M, Klose KJ, Arnold R, Alfke H. Transarterial chemoembolization of advanced liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors--a retrospective single-center analysis.

2003 ; 68 : 94 -101 [PMID: 14593235 DOI: 10 .1159 /000074522 ]

53 Moris D, Tsilimigras DI, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Beal EW, Felekouras E, Vernadakis S, Fung JJ, Pawlik TM. Liver transplantation in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review.

2017 ; 162 : 525 -536 [PMID: 28624178 DOI: 10 .1016 /j.surg.2017 .05 .006 ]

54 Lim C, Lahat E, Osseis M, Sotirov D, Salloum C, Azoulay D. Liver Transplantation for Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Have We Learned?

2018 ; 38 : 351 -356 [PMID: 30357772 DOI: 10 .1055 /s-0038 -1669936 ]

55 Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, Bohas CL, Wolin EM, Van Cutsem E, Hobday TJ, Okusaka T, Capdevila J, de Vries EG,Tomassetti P, Pavel ME, Hoosen S, Haas T, Lincy J, Lebwohl D, ?berg K; RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors,Third Trial (RADIANT-3 ) Study Group. Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 2011 ;364 : 514 -523 [PMID: 21306238 DOI: 10 .1056 /NEJMoa1009290 ]

56 Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL, Bang YJ, Borbath I, Lombard-Bohas C, Valle J, Metrakos P, Smith D, Vinik A, Chen JS,H?rsch D, Hammel P, Wiedenmann B, Van Cutsem E, Patyna S, Lu DR, Blanckmeister C, Chao R, Ruszniewski P.Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

2011 ; 364 : 501 -513 [PMID:21306237 DOI: 10 .1056 /NEJMoa1003825 ]

57 Eriksson B, Annibale B, Bajetta E, Mitry E, Pavel M, Platania M, Salazar R, Pl?ckinger U; Mallorca Consensus Conference participants; European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: chemotherapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

2009 ; 90 :214 -219 [PMID: 19713713 DOI: 10 .1159 /000225950 ]

58 Bodei L, Mueller-Brand J, Baum RP, Pavel ME, H?rsch D, O'Dorisio MS, O'Dorisio TM, Howe JR, Cremonesi M,Kwekkeboom DJ, Zaknun JJ. The joint IAEA, EANM, and SNMMI practical guidance on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) in neuroendocrine tumours.

2013 ; 40 : 800 -816 [PMID: 23389427 DOI:10 .1007 /s00259 -012 -2330 -6 ]

59 Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, Mittra E, Kunz PL, Kulke MH, Jacene H, Bushnell D,O'Dorisio TM, Baum RP, Kulkarni HR, Caplin M, Lebtahi R, Hobday T, Delpassand E, Van Cutsem E, Benson A,Srirajaskanthan R, Pavel M, Mora J, Berlin J, Grande E, Reed N, Seregni E, ?berg K, Lopera Sierra M, Santoro P,Thevenet T, Erion JL, Ruszniewski P, Kwekkeboom D, Krenning E; NETTER-1 Trial Investigators. Phase 3 Trial of 177 Lu-Dotatate for Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors.

2017 ; 376 : 125 -135 [PMID: 28076709 DOI:10 .1056 /NEJMoa1607427 ]

60 Rodbard D. Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.

2017 ; 19 : S25 -S37 [PMID: 28585879 DOI: 10 .1089 /dia.2017 .0035 ]

61 Knigge U, Capdevila J, Bartsch DK, Baudin E, Falkerby J, Kianmanesh R, Kos-Kudla B, Niederle B, Nieveen van Dijkum E, O'Toole D, Pascher A, Reed N, Sundin A, Vullierme MP; Antibes Consensus Conference Participants; Antibes Consensus Conference participants. ENETS Consensus Recommendations for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Follow-Up and Documentation.

2017 ; 105 : 310 -319 [PMID: 28222443 DOI:10 .1159 /000458155 ]

62 Spada F, Rossi RE, Kara E, Laffi A, Massironi S, Rubino M, Grimaldi F, Bhoori S, Fazio N. Carcinoid Syndrome and Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia Associated with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Critical Review on Clinical and Pharmacological Management.

2021 ; 14 [PMID: 34199977 DOI: 10 .3390 /ph14060539 ]

松阳县| 巨野县| 尚义县| 密云县| 洛扎县| 舞钢市| 遵化市| 九龙坡区| 抚顺市| 治多县| 上栗县| 海南省| 琼结县| 舟山市| 治县。| 黔西县| 称多县| 南投县| 南宫市| 永嘉县| 福清市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 安丘市| 大连市| 东乡| 中西区| 苍溪县| 封丘县| 灵寿县| 株洲市| 陇西县| 鹤壁市| 澜沧| 瑞昌市| 平谷区| 平邑县| 汶川县| 武功县| 榆林市| 融水| 股票|