Dian-Jun Ye, Ji-Min Zhang

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China

Introduction

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is a key enzyme that contributes in the metabolic process of pyrimidine nucleotides.TP has a structure similar to that of platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF); therefore, these two constituents are considered to be the same substance.TP promotes angiogenesis and has important functions in growth, invasion, and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma1.TP also can selectively activate anticancer reagent 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5′-DFUR) into fluorouracil (5-FU), resulting in an inhibiting effect on cancer cells.Consequently, these drugs can have antitumor effects.Therefore, TP expression studies are important for investigating angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma,as well as for chemotherapy.

Biological property of TP

Friedkin discovered TP in a biological body in 1954.In 1975,Voytek and Blank separated and purified TP from Escherichia coli and Salmonella, which had a 45 kDa subunit dimer.In 1978,Kubilus was the first to purify a eukaryotic cell TP from the amniotic membrane chorion of a human.This eukaryotic cell TP was a 47 kDa-subunit dimer that had the same properties as E.coli TP.In 1987, Miyazono stimulated an aortic endothelial cell and obtained PD-ECGF in platelet-cleaving factors from the proliferation of endothelial cells.In 1992, Furukawa discovered that the 120 amino acid sequences in the cDNA of E.coli TP were identical to the sequences of PD-ECGF through mass cloning experiments.This discovery has drawn attention to the relationship between TP and PD-ECGF.In 1993, Sumizawa’s study showed that recombinant PD-ECGF possesses TP activity,and TP could promote angiogenesis activity.The PD-ECGF polypeptide could be recognized by anti-TP antibody.This result suggests that these two materials have a high degree of homology.In 1995, Miyadera purified human placenta TP and analyzed the amino acid sequences.He discovered that the N-terminal sequences of TP and PD-ECGF had slight differences, with some missed fragments in the course of purification.Therefore,TP and PD-ECGF were identified as transcription products from the same gene.To date, TP and PD-ECGF are considered similar substances that contribute in the metabolic process of pyrimidine nucleotides and promote angiogenesis inside the body.

TP is a homodimer that consists of two polypeptide chains.Its relative molecular mass and best-fit PH value are 55 kDa and 5.3, respectively.TP gene is located on the q13 region of chromosome 22.Its main biological functions are the following:(1) TP can reversibly catalyze thymidine dephosphorylation.This catalysis subsequently generates thymine and 2-deoxyribose-D-ribose-1-phosphate, which can maintain a stable level of thymidine inside the body, including thymidine degradation for carbon and energy source and nucleotide synthesis with thymine.Deoxyribose can be transferred from deoxynucleoside to other basic groups for new deoxynucleoside formulation2; (2) TP/PD-ECGF can stimulate chemotaxis and growth of endothelial cells in vitro and affects angiogenesis inside the body; (3) TP can catalyze the chemical reaction between drugs of anti-pyrimidine metabolism 5-fluorouracil(FU) and 1-phosphate-2-deoxyribose.The resulting 5- fluoro-2-deoxyuridine is involved in the metabolic process of 5-FU.The end product of metabolism, which has an anticancer activity,is then generated3; (4) TP is also the key metabolic enzyme of 5′-DFUR and CAP, which are the prodrugs of 5-FU.TP can promote 5′-DFUR and CAP and convert them into 5-FU to exert antitumor effects3.

Relationship between TP and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer

Formation and development of malignant tumor generally rely on neovascularization.As an angiogenesis-promoting factor, TP has an important function in the growth, invasion,and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma.Inokuchi4indicated that patients with high TP expression in colorectal carcinoma tissue have more new vessels in the cancer tissues and exhibit liver metastasis; bad prognosis could more easily occur in these patients.Using immunohistochemical staining method, Tsujianti5studied the relationship between TP expression, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and microvessel density (MVD) in gastric cancer that the placenta percreta had infiltrated.The results showed that the tumors expressing positive TP and VEGF had the maximum MVD.By contrast, the tumors expressing negative TP and VEGF had the minimum MVD.Xia et al.6studied the relationship between TP, VEGF expression, and clinicopathologic characteristics of 88 colorectal carcinoma specimens using immunohistochemical staining EnVision two-step method.Approximately 42.05% (37/88) and 23.86% (21/88)colorectal carcinoma tissues were TP positive and expressed VEGF, respectively.Almost no expression was observed in normal colonic mucosa.This result suggests that TP and VEGF may be necessary for the differentiation and development of cancer cells.Given the obviously lower expression of VEGF than TP, angiogenesis in colorectal carcinoma tissue possibly relies on TP to a greater degree than on VEGF.Therefore, angiogenesis mediated by TP is more likely the key factor of development and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma.TP is different from VEGF and other growth factors because no hydrophobic signal peptide exists at the N-terminal.This phenomenon is not a classical secretory protein.The enzymatic activity of TP can generate corresponding products to promote angiogenesis.Nishina et al.3stated that TP can catalyze thymidine to obtain 2-deoxidization-D-ribose, and these metabolic processes can induce a mass of free radicals and create a local oxidized stress state.This state induces an expression of active factors, such as VEGF and IL-8.Angiogenesis in colorectal carcinoma is promoted in each functional pathway.This result suggests that TP expression promotes angiogenesis of colorectal carcinoma and contributes to growth, development, and metastasis of tumor.However, further studies are still needed to clearly elucidate the interactions between TP expression and other growth factors.

TP expression in colorectal carcinoma

The expression of TP in colorectal carcinoma tissues is apparently higher than in the surrounding normal tissues.However, different findings exist on whether cancer cells or interstitial cells in carcinoma tissues express TP.Early studies have indicated that cancer cells could directly express TP in high level, as verified in gastric and breast cancers.In 2001,Kono used immunohistochemistry to compare colorectal cancer specimens by applying different anti-TP antibodies of 654-1 and 1 c6-203.Cancer cells were positively expressed in 20% and 60% of the 654-1 and 1C6-203 applied specimens,respectively, after immunohistochemical staining.The 654-1 antibody was mainly expressed in interstitial cells.In 2002,Tokunaga also studied the 1C6-203 antibody, and the results showed that TP was positively expressed in 68% of the colorectal carcinoma specimens.Yoshimoto et al.7analyzed TP expressions in 61 colorectal carcinoma specimens.The result indicated that TP was mainly expressed in interstitial cells surrounding the tumor tissue or in filtrating the border of the tumor.Lymph node metastasis was also related to this phenomenon, which suggests that TP may be expressed by cancer cells, and then subsequently released to the in filtrating edge.

In recent years, studies have suggested that TP is mainly expressed by interstitial cells in the tumor tissue, especially the tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) on the tumor edge.In 1999,Ono concluded that when a tumor is present in an organism,cancer cells would release different kinds of chemokines, such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1.These chemokines could induce migration of mononuclear cells toward the tumor location and differentiation of macrophages.The differentiation could generate mass of cytokines, such as VEGF, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), TNF-ɑ, interferon (INF), epidermal growth factor, and TP to induce angiogenesis.Zhang et al.8performed TP enzyme assays and protein quantitative detections for 40 cases of colorectal carcinoma specimens; 6 colorectal carcinoma cell lines, namely, LS174T, Clone A, Colo320, CX-1,Lovo, and MIPIO1; and 2 macrophagic systems of THP-1 and U937.The methods used include enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunohistochemical staining method.The results showed that the TP activity of colorectal carcinoma cell was evidently higher than that of the normal tissue.Minute and small amounts of TP proteins were detected in LS174T and Lovo, respectively; however, these proteins were not detected in the other four carcinoma cell lines.Up to 18.2 and 19.3 U/mg of TP proteins were detected in THP-1 and U937,respectively.This finding indicated that few TP proteins were expressed in colorectal carcinoma cells.The majority of cells that expressed TP activity were interstitial cells surrounding the cancer cells, especially the TAM.Consequently, few TP proteins were expressed in colorectal carcinoma cells, which were mostly TAM9, in the surrounding interstitial tissues.You et al.10analyzed 28 specimens with colorectal carcinoma metastasis using immunohistochemical staining method and other methods.The results showed that the cells in colorectal carcinoma metastasis tissue that positively expressed TP were mostly TAM.Most results showed that TP activity was likely expressed by TAM.These findings have drawn the attention of several researchers, and similar studies are currently underway.Ren et al.11conducted immunohistochemical staining analyses of 33 colorectal carcinoma specimens, and the results showed that TP was mostly expressed in cancer cells at the in filtrating edge.However, inflammatory cells (such as mononuclear cells, lymphocyte, and neutrophile granulocytes) in normal colorectal mucosa could also express TP.This result indirectly indicated that TP was mostly expressed by TAM in colorectal tissues.Kobayashi et al.12observed the distribution of TP in cells using an electron microscope.The results showed that TP in colorectal carcinoma tissue was mainly distributed inside the particulate granules of macrophages.Makino et al.13analyzed the genetic expressions of 43 colon cancer patients using laser capture microdissection and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) methods.The result showed that TP was expressed more in tumor stroma cells than in tumor cells.

In recent years, studies have indicated that TP activity was more likely to be expressed by TAM in colorectal cancer tissues.This finding has attracted considerable research attention.However, many factors affecting TP expression need to be further investigated.

Relationship between TP and colorectal carcinoma treatment

TP has a vital function in colorectal carcinoma treatment: it catalyzes the conversion from 5-FU prodrugs (e.g., 5′-DFUR and CAP) to 5-FU that has antitumor activity.Three sequential enzyme reactions are present in this process.CAP is converted to 5′-deoxidation-5-flucytosine (dFCyd) under the action of carboxy-esterase in the liver after intestinal absorption, after which it is converted to 5′-DFUR by cytidine deaminase in the tumor tissue.When 5′-DFUR enters the tumor tissue, it is converted into 5-FU that has antitumor activity by TP.5-FU functions in targeted-antitumor effect by blocking the DNA synthesis of tumor cells3.Slager et al.14stated that TP is a target in oncotherapy processes with 5-FU and derivatives, and has an important function in growth, development, and metastasis processes of tumor.In 1998, Schwartz et al.15, transferred the INF gene into HT29 colorectal carcinoma cells, and found that the levels of TP proteins and mRNA increased.This laboratory finding indicated that INF could adjust TP expression during or after the transcription process.Thus, the conversion efficiency of 5′-DFUR to 5-FU increased, and the antitumor effects of 5′-DFUR were enhanced.In 2002, Nagata et al.16analyzed the colorectal cancer cells with human TP transfection using MTT and other methods.The results showed that TP activity obviously increased compared with non-transfected cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.The sensitivity to 5′-DFUR increased, and the antitumor effects were enhanced.This finding is also indicated in Boskos’ study17.

Research findings have shown that colorectal carcinoma cells hardly express TP.Although 5-FU prodrugs are effective in colorectal carcinoma treatment, the transfer mechanism of drugs in cancer tissue remains unclear.Current studies support that the interstitial cells of cancer tissues, especially TAM, have an important function in conversion processes.Zhang et al.18studied the antitumor effects of 5′-DFUR adjusted by two macrophage systems.The results showed that TP expressed by macrophage system transferred the 5′-DFUR to 5-FU, and consequently,5-FU had an antineoplastic effect.This finding indirectly indicated that TP expression could strengthen the anticancer effect of 5′-DFUR.Zhang et al.19,20analyzed the protein quantification and medium effective concentration on six colorectal carcinoma cell lines and two macrophage systems using ELISA, MTT, and other methods.The results showed that macrophages transferred 5′-DFUR to 5-FU; Thus, 5-FU could be released into the medium to produce a colorectal carcinoma cell growth-inhibiting effect.This result indicated that the macrophage could strengthen the antitumor effects of anticancer cells.Yasuno et al.21analyzed 97 colorectal carcinoma specimens through immunohistochemical staining method.The findings indicated that patients with high TP expression and treated with fluorouracil exhibited better prognosis.This result indirectly showed that TP expressed in the mesenchyme could strengthen the antitumor effects of 5′-DFUR.

A number of chemotherapeutics, such as oxaliplatin,vorinostat, taxanes, and cyclophosphamide could improve TP expression in colorectal carcinoma cells.These drugs, together with fluorouracil, can produce a synergistic effect to improve the curative effect of chemotherapy.The study of Cassidy22showed that CAP applied with oxaliplatin could improve TP expression and chemosensitivity with a synergistic effect.Gennaro et al.23used RT-PCR, protein blot and immunohistochemical staining to prove that vorinostat with CAP could induce TP upregulation.This combined treatment also increased the collaborative anti-proliferation and cell apoptosis in vitro.

5-FU is a representative drug of colorectal carcinoma treatment that used to be the only therapeutic drug before 198524.However, 5-Fu has significant toxic side effects,including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and myelosuppression.The development of biomedical technology resulted in the development of drugs with better therapeutic effects, such as CAP combined with oxaliplatin22.At present, 5-FU tends to be replaced by CAP as the best chemotherapeutic drug.On the other hand, CAP has some effects on patients who experienced 5-FU treatment failure.As an oral solution, CAP can simulate the antitumor effect of continuous intravenous drip of 5-FU.CAP is more convenient and simple to administer, prevents retention in vessels or chemotherapy pump, and has less side effects.Therefore, CAP is expected to be the drug of choice for the treatment of colorectal carcinoma25.Unger et al.26showed that CAP and celecoxib could be used with radiotherapy to obtain a good therapeutic effect.Chiorean et al.27indicated that the new adjuvant chemotherapy of combined utilization of CAP and irinotecan could also provide a good versus-tumor effect during the progressive stage of colorectal carcinoma treatment.Sadahiro et al.28studied 76 patients with colorectal carcinoma surgical treatments to detect the responses of the patients to 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) or oral uracil and tegafur/LV.The results showed that a high expression of TP could increase body reactions to oral chemotherapeutics.Consequently, the curative effect of chemotherapy could be improved.

TP expression in colorectal carcinoma has a dual function.High expression of TP is related to poor prognosis factors of infiltration, growth, and tumor metastasis.Therefore,a number of studies concluded that TP inhibitors could help prevent angiogenesis and metastasis.6-Amino-5-bromouracil is the classic TP inhibitor29.Studies in recent years indicated that 5-chloro-6-[(2-iminopyrrolidin-1-yl) methyl]uracil and 5-fluoro-6-[(2-aminoimidazol-1-yl)methyl]uracil are the two new developed and more effective TP inhibitors.The effect of the former is 1000 times better than that of 6-Amino-5-bromouracil30,31.Miyatani et al.32stated that a combination of TP inhibitor and radiotherapy is effective for colon cancer.This result indicated that the TP inhibitor may function as a radiation sensitizer.In addition, TP is necessary for 5-FU prodrug activation.Promotion of TP expression in colorectal cancer tissue improves the curative effect of fluorouracil drugs, and this curative effect is important in colorectal carcinoma treatment.Therefore, increasing and decreasing TP expression in tissues have important effects on the emergence and development of tumors, as well as on the indices of treatment and prognosis.

Summary

TP expression has dual influences on colorectal carcinoma.On one hand, excessive TP expression is related to in filtration,metastasis, and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma.Its promoting effect on angiogenesis based on enzymatic activity is also unique.On the other hand, TP is the key enzyme that contributes in the transformation from prodrug 5-FU to drugs with antitumor effects.TP also contributes in predicting toxicity of chemotherapy and sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5-FU.TP is an effective target site which is the main focus for targeted therapy studies.However, further research is needed because many mechanisms of interactions between TP and other angiogenesis factors, as well as inhibiting factors, are still not clearly elucidated.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

1.Bronckaers A, Gago F, Balzarini J, Liekens S.The dual role of thymidine phosphorylase in cancer development and chemotherapy.Med Res Rev 2009;29:903-953.

2.Liekens S, Bronckaers A, Pérez-Pérez MJ, Balzarini J.Targeting platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor/thymidine phosphorylase for cancer therapy.Biochem Pharmacol 2007;74:1555-1567.

3.Nishina T, Hyodo I, Miyaike J, Inaba T, Suzuki S, Shiratori Y.The ratio of thymidine phosphorylase to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in tumour tissues of patients with metastatic gastric cancer is predictive of the clinical response to 5’-deoxy-5-fluorouridine.Eur J Cancer 2004;40:1566-1571.

4.Inokuchi M, Uetake H, Shirota Y, Yamada H, Tajima M, Sugihara K.Gene expression of 5- fluorouracil metabolic enzymes in primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2004;53:391-396.

5.Tsujitani S, Saito H, Maeta Y, Yamaguchi K, Tatebe S, Kondo A, et al.Neoangiogenesis in patients with gastric carcinoma in relation to the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and thymidine phosphorylase.Anticancer Res 2004;24(3b):1853-1859.

6.Xia CS, Li NP, Wu CD, Wang YS, Wang SG.The expression of TP,VEGF and its relationship with clinical Pathological significance in Colorectal Cancer.Zhongguo Zuzhi Huaxue Yu Xibao Huaxue Zazhi 2011;20:182-186 (in Chinese).

7.Yoshimoto K, Kawahara H, Kobayashi S, Kashiwagi H, Hirai K,Yanaga K.Importance of thymidine phosphorylase expression at the invasive front of T3 rectal cancer as a prognostic factor.Dig Surg 2006;23(5-6):331-335.

8.Zhang JM, Liu MJ, Mizoi T, Shiiba KI, Sasaki I, Matsuno S.Thymidine phosphorylase expression by macrophage in colorectal carcinoma and its relationship with tumor angiogenesis.Zhonghua Weichang Waike Zazhi 2003;6:247-250 (in Chinese).

9.Zhang JM, Mizoi T, Shiiba K, Sasaki I, Matsuno S.Expression of thymidine phosphorylase by macrophages in colorectal cancer tissues.World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:545-549.

10.You W, Zhang JM, Zou XC, Hao ZF, Liao DG, Huang SZ, et al.Expression of thymidine phosphorylase in human metastatic liver cancer tissues from colorectal cancer.Guoji Waikexue Zazhi 2009;36:440-444 (in Chinese).

11.Ren JL, Tian L, Liang JF, Zheng HX, Xiao H.Expression ofThymidylate Synthase and thymidine phosphorylase in human colorectal cancer tissue.Shanxi Yiyao Zazhi.2010;39:1085-1087(in Chinese).

12.Kobayashi M, Okamoto K, Akimori T, Tochika N, Yoshimoto T, Okabayashi T, et al.Localization of thymidine phosphorylase in advanced gastric and colorectal cancer.J Mol Histol 2004;35:69-74.

13.Makino H, Uetake H, Danenberg K, Danenberg PV, Sugihara K.Efficacy of laser capture microdissection plus RT-PCR technique in analyzing gene expression levels in human gastric cancer and colon cancer.BMC Cancer 2008;8:210.

14.Slager EH, Honders MW, van der Meijden ED, van Luxemburg-Heijs SA, Kloosterboer FM, Kester MG, et al.Identification of the angiogenic endothelial-cell growth factor-1/thymidine phosphorylase as a potential target for immunotherapy of cancer.Blood 2006;107:4954-4960.

15.Schwartz EL, Wan E, Wang FS, Baptiste N.Regulation of expression of thymidine phosphorylase/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor in human colon carcinoma cells.Cancer Res 1998;58:1551-1557.

16.Nagata T, Nakamori M, Iwahashi M, Yamaue H.Overexpression of pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylase enhances the sensitivity to 5’-deoxy-5- fluorouridine in tumour cells in vitro and in vivo.Eur J Cancer 2002;38:712-717.

17.Boskos CS, Liacos C, Korkolis D, Aygerinos K, Lamproglou I,Terpos E, et al.Thymidine phosphorylase to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase ratio as a predictive factor of response to preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in patients with advanced rectal cancer.J Surg Oncol 2010;102:408-412.

18.Zhang J, Mizoi T, Harada N, Shiiba K, Miyagawa K, Matsuno S, et al.Thymidine phosphorylase expressed in macrophages enhances antitumor effect of 5’-deoxy-5- fluorouridine on human colorectal carcinoma cells.Anticancer Res 2003;23(1A):323-329.

19.Zhang JM, Liu MJ, Mizoi T, Shiiba KI, Sasaki I, Matsuno S.Enhancement of anticancer effect of 5′-deoxy-5- fluorouridine by macrophage-like cells on colorectal carcinoma cells.Zhonghua Weichang Waike Zazhi 2004;7:218-221(in Chinese) .

20.Zhang JM, Liu MJ, Mizoi T, Shiiba KI, Sasaki I, Matsuno S.Thymidine phosphorylase expressed in monocyte-macrophages enhanced anticancer effect of 5-deoxy-5- fluorouridine on colorectal carcinoma cells.Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi 2004;84:806-812 (in Chinese).

21.Yasuno M, Mori T, Koike M, Takahashi K, Toi M, Takizawa T, et al.Importance of thymidine phosphorylase expression in tumor stroma as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.Oncol Rep 2005;13:405-412.

22.Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Twelves C, Brunet R, Butts C, Conroy T, et al.XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin): active first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2084-2091.

23.Di Gennaro E, Piro G, Chianese MI, Franco R, Di Cintio A, Moccia T, et al.Vorinostat synergises with capecitabine through upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase.Br J Cancer 2010;103:1680-1691.

24.Chession DB, Guillem JG.Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: historic perspective and current issues.Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2005;25:569-586.

25.Zhao H, Zhang YC, Pu SJ.Clinic research on the oxaliplatin combination with xeloda in the treatment of advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.Zhongguo dangdai Yiyao 2012;19:69-70 (in Chinese).

26.Unger KR, Romney DA, Koc M, Moskaluk CA, Friel CM,Foley EF, et al.Preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer using capecitabine and celecoxib correlated with posttreatment assessment of thymidylate synthase and thymidine phosphorylase expression.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:1377-1382.

27.Chiorean EG, Sanghani S, Schiel MA, Yu M, Burns M, Tong Y,et al.Phase II and gene expression analysis trial of neoadjuvant capecitabine plus irinotecan followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Hoosier Oncology Group GI03-53.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2012;70:25-32.

28.Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Tanaka A, Okada K, Nagase H, Uchida J.Association of right-sided tumors with high thymidine phosphorylase gene expression levels and the response to oral uracil and tegafur/leucovorin chemotherapy among patients with colorectal cancer.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2012;70: 285-291.

29.Reigan P, Gbaj A, Chinje E, Stratford IJ, Douglas KT, Freeman S.Synthesis and enzymatic evaluation of xanthine oxidase-activated prodrugs based on inhibitors of thymidine phosphorylase.Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2004;14:5247-5250.

30.Grierson JR, Brockenbrough JS, Rasey JS, Wiens L, Vesselle H.Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of 5- fluoro-6-[(2-iminopyrrolidin-1-YL)methyl] uracil, TPI(F): an inhibitor of human thymidine phosphorylase (TP).Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2010;29:49-54.

31.Jain HV, Rasheed R, Kalman TI.The role of phosphate in the action of thymidine phosphorylase inhibitors: Implications for the catalytic mechanism.Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2010 ;20:1648-1651.

32.Miyatani T, Kurita N, Utsunomiya T, Iwata T, Nishioka M,Yoshikawa K, et al.Platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor augments radiotherapeutic efficacy in experimental colorectal cancer.Cancer Lett2012;318:199-205.